Abstract
This paper aims to survey some of the problems associated with rating scales used
in speaking tests. It will explore various types of rating scales, including analytic,
holistic, and dynamic scales, highlighting their strengths and limitations.
Furthermore, the paper will delve into the challenges of subjectivity, cultural bias,
limited descriptors, and the overemphasis on language form, which can impact the
reliability of speaking assessments. By identifying these issues, the paper seeks to
contribute to the ongoing discourse on best practices in language testing and offer
recommendations for enhancing rating scales.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ravshanova Ruzigul